Non-Compete Clauses in Dutch Employment Law: What You Need to Know in The Netherlands

Non-compete clauses are common in Dutch employment contracts. But what exactly are they, and what details should you be privy to about these non-competition clauses in the Netherlands? This article provides an overview of non-compete clauses under Dutch employment law.

A non-compete clause prevents an employee from working for a competitor or starting a competing business after leaving their employer. The clause is designed to protect the employer’s business interests. However, a non-compete clause must be clear and comply with some distinct necessities for their legality under Dutch law.

This article covers key questions around non-compete clauses in the Netherlands:

Can employers use a non-compete clause in an employment contract?

Yes, Dutch employers can include a non-compete clause in employment agreements. However, the clause must be agreed upon in writing for it to be valid.

The purpose of such a clause is to prevent unfair competition from former employees. But employers cannot enforce a non-compete clause without limitations. Restrictions must be reasonable and necessary to protect legitimate business interests.

What constitutes a legitimate business interest for a non-compete clause?

Dutch law acknowledges merely three legitimate employer’s interests for non-competition agreements:

  • Safeguarding trade secrets or confidential information
  • Protecting client relations that require special trust
  • Preventing unfair solicitation of employees away from the company

If a non-compete clause serves different purposes, Dutch courts may rule it invalid.

Can employers use non-compete clauses in all employment contracts?

No. Non-compete agreements are only valid in permanent employment contracts under Dutch law.

Employers cannot impose post-term non-competes in fixed-term employment agreements. This includes most temporary contracts.

However, employers can include non-solicitation clauses in fixed-term contracts. These prevent former employees from poaching clients or staff. But solicitation restrictions still must adhere to reasonableness standards.

How long can a non-compete last in the Netherlands?

Dutch law does not specify an exact time limit for non-compete clauses. Duration depends on the interests at stake and industry practices.

Non-competes exceeding one year are rare. Many Dutch employers opt for 6-12 month restriction periods. But even shorter non-competes can safeguard legitimate aims.

Courts assess each case individually, considering the employer’s needs against the impact on the employee. Overly long or broad non-competes often fail this balancing test.

Which activities can employers restrict through a non-compete clause?

Non-competes cannot ban any commercial activity that disadvantages the former employer. Restrictions must remain proportionate to identified business interests.

For example, a non-compete may prevent contacting former clients or working in product development. But it cannot bar someone from utilizing their general professional skills.

Judges narrow overreaching non-compete clauses to make them enforceable. But employers should draft agreements prudently to begin with.

Are employees obliged to comply with non-compete clauses under Dutch law?

Yes, employees must adhere to reasonable non-compete agreements made as part of an employment contract. Violating contractual loyaly duties can enable damage claims from the employer.

However, former employees can contest disputed non-compete clauses in court. If judges find the restrictions unnecessary or overly strict, they will render the clause invalid.

Employees should therefore consider legal support when facing extensive non-compete barriers after leaving a job.

Can employers claim damages for breaching non-compete clauses?

Dutch law allows damage claims against employees violating valid non-compete agreements. Compensation often equals the profits lost due to improper competition.

However, employers carry the burden of proof. They must demonstrate actual losses relating to the breach of non-compete duties.

Dutch courts also reduce damage awards if employers contributed to their own harm. For example, by failing to keep business secrets truly confidential.

What alternatives exist besides non-compete clauses?

Instead of non-competes, employers can use:

  • Non-solicitation agreements in fixed-term contracts
  • Confidentiality clauses for trade secrets
  • Return-of-property contracts for commercial assets
  • Garden leave provisions to bridge sensitive transitions

More flexible instruments often achieve similar employee loyalty aims. Consultation with an employment lawyer in the Netherlands can help identify suitable options.